Dust vs Langbase
Dust vs Langbase, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Dust is on 64/100 and Langbase on 20/100.
Where each one leads
Dust
- our overall score: 64/100 against 20/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 143 against 15
- LinkedIn following: 36,142 against 3,589
Langbase
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Dust | Langbase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Platform for building and deploying custom AI agents connected to company knowledge and tools. | Serverless AI developer platform with unified LLM API and AI agents. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, Large Language Model | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, Large Language Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Dust | Langbase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 143 | 15 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $61.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 36,142 | 3,589 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Dust | Langbase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 20/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 12/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 10/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 61/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Dust | Langbase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Dust | Langbase |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Custom AI Agent Building, Context-Aware Infrastructure, Universal Access Layer, Advanced AI Model Support, Enterprise-Grade Security & Compliance, Multi-tool Agent Capabilities | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | Dust | Langbase |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 1.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
Dust vs Langbase: common questions
Which is better, Dust or Langbase?
On our 0-100 score Dust rates higher (64/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Dust and Langbase compare on the numbers?
Dust leads on our overall score (64/100 against 20/100), domain rating (73/100 against 53/100), headcount (143 against 15), LinkedIn following (36,142 against 3,589).
Read the full Dust review and pricing or the Langbase review and pricing. You can also browse other Dust alternatives we track.