Duck Creek Technologies vs Tesora
Duck Creek Technologies vs Tesora, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Duck Creek Technologies is on 52/100 and Tesora on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Duck Creek Technologies
- our overall score: 52/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 21/100
- funding raised: $120M against $10.0M
Tesora
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 45/100
At a glance
| Measure | Duck Creek Technologies | Tesora |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | SaaS core systems provider for the P&C and general insurance industry. | Tesora builds agents for actuaries at P&C carriers, reinsurers, and MGAs, providing an agentic workbench that ingests data and builds, audits, and deploys raters and pricing analyses. |
| Category | InsurTech, Vertical SaaS, SaaS, Low Code | Agentic AI, AI Agent, InsurTech, Vertical SaaS |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2000 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Duck Creek Technologies | Tesora |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 5 |
| Total funding | $120M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Private Equity | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 534 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Duck Creek Technologies | Tesora |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 43/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 21/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Duck Creek Technologies | Tesora |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Duck Creek Technologies vs Tesora: common questions
Which is better, Duck Creek Technologies or Tesora?
On our 0-100 score Duck Creek Technologies rates higher (52/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Duck Creek Technologies and Tesora compare on the numbers?
Duck Creek Technologies leads on our overall score (52/100 against 46/100), domain rating (68/100 against 21/100), funding raised ($120M against $10.0M). Tesora leads on agent readiness (54/100 against 45/100).
Read the full Duck Creek Technologies review and pricing or the Tesora review and pricing. You can also browse other Duck Creek Technologies alternatives we track.