Dub vs FullContact
Dub vs FullContact, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Dub is on 49/100 and FullContact on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Dub
- agent readiness: 63/100 against 41/100
FullContact
- our overall score: 57/100 against 49/100
- headcount: 61 against 19
- funding raised: $42.0M against $17.0M
- LinkedIn following: 11,866 against 5,784
At a glance
| Measure | Dub | FullContact |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A modern link attribution platform for short links, conversion tracking, and affiliate programs. | Identity resolution platform that unifies and enriches customer data for businesses. |
| Category | MarTech, AdTech, Link Management, Link Shortener | MarTech, AdTech, Data Enrichment, Identity Resolution |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Denver, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Dub | FullContact |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 61 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -17.4% |
| Total funding | $17.0M | $42.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,784 | 11,866 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Dub | FullContact |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | 13/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (63/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 81/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Dub | FullContact |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Dub | FullContact |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | 20% off for 3 months | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | Dub | FullContact |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
Dub vs FullContact: common questions
Which is better, Dub or FullContact?
On our 0-100 score FullContact rates higher (57/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Dub and FullContact compare on the numbers?
Dub leads on agent readiness (63/100 against 41/100). FullContact leads on our overall score (57/100 against 49/100), headcount (61 against 19), funding raised ($42.0M against $17.0M), LinkedIn following (11,866 against 5,784).
Read the full Dub review and pricing or the FullContact review and pricing. You can also browse other Dub alternatives we track.