Statement vs Panax
Statement vs Panax, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Statement is on 55/100 and Panax on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Statement
- LinkedIn following: 10,635 against 4,048
Panax
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 70 against 15
- headcount growth: +37.8% against +4.4%
- funding raised: $27.5M against $12.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Statement | Panax |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Streamlines corporate finance by connecting financial data for next-generation finance leaders. | Automates treasury operations to help finance teams control complexity and optimize cash. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Finance, Enterprise | Fintech, Management, Treasury Management, Corporate Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Statement | Panax |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15 | 70 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.4% | +37.8% |
| Total funding | $12.0M | $27.5M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,635 | 4,048 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Statement | Panax |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 31/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Statement | Panax |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Statement vs Panax: common questions
Which is better, Statement or Panax?
On our 0-100 score Panax rates higher (57/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Statement and Panax compare on the numbers?
Statement leads on LinkedIn following (10,635 against 4,048). Panax leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 37/100), headcount (70 against 15), headcount growth (+37.8% against +4.4%), funding raised ($27.5M against $12.0M).
Read the full Statement review and pricing or the Panax review and pricing. You can also browse other Statement alternatives we track.