dscout vs User Testing
dscout vs User Testing, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: dscout is on 63/100 and User Testing on 62/100.
Where each one leads
dscout
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
User Testing
- domain rating: 84/100 against 74/100
- headcount: 1,846 against 309
- LinkedIn following: 183,294 against 34,369
At a glance
| Measure | dscout | User Testing |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | UX research platform for gathering authentic human input and making confident decisions with AI. | Human insight platform for understanding user experience and product feedback. |
| Category | UX Research, Customer Insights, Market Research, Product Development | Customer Experience, User Research, Product Management, UX Research |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | dscout | User Testing |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 309 | 1,846 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +49.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $70.0M | $76.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 34,369 | 183,294 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | dscout | User Testing |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | dscout | User Testing |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
dscout vs User Testing: common questions
Which is better, dscout or User Testing?
On our 0-100 score dscout rates higher (63/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do dscout and User Testing compare on the numbers?
User Testing leads on domain rating (84/100 against 74/100), headcount (1,846 against 309), LinkedIn following (183,294 against 34,369).
Read the full dscout review and pricing or the User Testing review and pricing. You can also browse other dscout alternatives we track.