Doctolib vs Phreesia
Doctolib vs Phreesia, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Doctolib is on 70/100 and Phreesia on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Doctolib
- our overall score: 70/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 2,300 against 1,532
- funding raised: $816M against $120M
- LinkedIn following: 311,709 against 68,147
Phreesia
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 37/100
At a glance
| Measure | Doctolib | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A leading European healthcare platform connecting patients with healthcare professionals and streamlining administrative tasks. | A healthcare software platform automating patient check-in, scheduling, payments, and administrative tasks. |
| Category | HealthTech, Digital Health, Telemedicine, Healthcare | HealthTech, Healthcare IT, Patient Engagement, Healthcare Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B SaaS |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Doctolib | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,300 | 1,532 |
| Total funding | $816M | $120M |
| Latest round | Series G | Series D |
| Valuation | $6.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 311,709 | 68,147 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Doctolib | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 84/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Doctolib | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Doctolib vs Phreesia: common questions
Which is better, Doctolib or Phreesia?
On our 0-100 score Doctolib rates higher (70/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Doctolib and Phreesia compare on the numbers?
Doctolib leads on our overall score (70/100 against 61/100), headcount (2,300 against 1,532), funding raised ($816M against $120M), LinkedIn following (311,709 against 68,147). Phreesia leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 37/100).
Read the full Doctolib review and pricing or the Phreesia review and pricing. You can also browse other Doctolib alternatives we track.