Doctolib vs Phlo
Doctolib vs Phlo, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Doctolib is on 70/100 and Phlo on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Doctolib
- our overall score: 70/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 2,300 against 105
- funding raised: $816M against $23.4M
- LinkedIn following: 311,709 against 5,606
Phlo
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Doctolib | Phlo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A leading European healthcare platform connecting patients with healthcare professionals and streamlining administrative tasks. | A digital healthtech provider offering a comprehensive ecosystem of pharmacy and healthcare services. |
| Category | HealthTech, Digital Health, Telemedicine, Healthcare | HealthTech, Digital Pharmacy, E-commerce, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B | B2C | B2B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software | services | platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Glasgow, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Doctolib | Phlo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,300 | 105 |
| Total funding | $816M | $23.4M |
| Latest round | Series G | Series A1 |
| Valuation | $6.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 311,709 | 5,606 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Doctolib | Phlo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 41/100 |
| Quality | 84/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Doctolib | Phlo |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Intercom |
Doctolib vs Phlo: common questions
Which is better, Doctolib or Phlo?
On our 0-100 score Doctolib rates higher (70/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Doctolib and Phlo compare on the numbers?
Doctolib leads on our overall score (70/100 against 54/100), domain rating (76/100 against 34/100), headcount (2,300 against 105), funding raised ($816M against $23.4M), LinkedIn following (311,709 against 5,606).
Read the full Doctolib review and pricing or the Phlo review and pricing. You can also browse other Doctolib alternatives we track.