Doctolib vs Function Health
Doctolib vs Function Health, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Doctolib is on 70/100 and Function Health on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Doctolib
- our overall score: 70/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 2,300 against 7
- funding raised: $816M against $298M
- LinkedIn following: 311,709 against 152
Function Health
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 37/100
At a glance
| Measure | Doctolib | Function Health |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A leading European healthcare platform connecting patients with healthcare professionals and streamlining administrative tasks. | Membership-based service offering 160+ lab tests, doctor insights, and lifetime health tracking. |
| Category | HealthTech, Digital Health, Telemedicine, Healthcare | HealthTech, Telemedicine, Longevity, Precision Medicine |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2013 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Miami, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Doctolib | Function Health |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,300 | 7 |
| Total funding | $816M | $298M |
| Latest round | Series G | Series B |
| Valuation | $6.4B | $3K |
| LinkedIn followers | 311,709 | 152 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Doctolib | Function Health |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 41/100 |
| Quality | 84/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Doctolib | Function Health |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Svelte, Astro |
| Analytics | Not detected | Mixpanel |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Doctolib | Function Health |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Comprehensive Lab Tests, Doctor Insights & Clinician Summaries, Lifetime Results Tracking, Nationwide Testing Access, Early Disease Detection |
Doctolib vs Function Health: common questions
Which is better, Doctolib or Function Health?
On our 0-100 score Doctolib rates higher (70/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Doctolib and Function Health compare on the numbers?
Doctolib leads on our overall score (70/100 against 55/100), headcount (2,300 against 7), funding raised ($816M against $298M), LinkedIn following (311,709 against 152). Function Health leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 37/100).
Read the full Doctolib review and pricing or the Function Health review and pricing. You can also browse other Doctolib alternatives we track.