Discuss.io vs User Testing
Discuss.io vs User Testing, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Discuss.io is on 53/100 and User Testing on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Discuss.io
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
User Testing
- our overall score: 62/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 1,846 against 305
- funding raised: $76.0M against $5.9M
- LinkedIn following: 183,294 against 5,103
At a glance
| Measure | Discuss.io | User Testing |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Qualitative research platform combining human and AI-powered interviews for faster, deeper insights. | Human insight platform for understanding user experience and product feedback. |
| Category | Qualitative Research, Market Research, AI Agents, Customer Insights | Customer Experience, User Research, Product Management, UX Research |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Discuss.io | User Testing |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 305 | 1,846 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -3.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $5.9M | $76.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,103 | 183,294 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Discuss.io | User Testing |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 32/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | Not published | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Discuss.io | User Testing |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Discuss.io vs User Testing: common questions
Which is better, Discuss.io or User Testing?
On our 0-100 score User Testing rates higher (62/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Discuss.io and User Testing compare on the numbers?
User Testing leads on our overall score (62/100 against 53/100), domain rating (84/100 against 60/100), headcount (1,846 against 305), funding raised ($76.0M against $5.9M), LinkedIn following (183,294 against 5,103).
Read the full Discuss.io review and pricing or the User Testing review and pricing. You can also browse other Discuss.io alternatives we track.