Discuss.io vs Maze
Discuss.io vs Maze, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Discuss.io is on 53/100 and Maze on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Discuss.io
- headcount: 305 against 164
Maze
- our overall score: 61/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 60/100
- funding raised: $92.8M against $5.9M
- LinkedIn following: 41,077 against 5,103
At a glance
| Measure | Discuss.io | Maze |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Qualitative research platform combining human and AI-powered interviews for faster, deeper insights. | User research and testing platform for product teams to validate designs with real users. |
| Category | Qualitative Research, Market Research, AI Agents, Customer Insights | Product Management Tools, User Research, UX Design, Customer Feedback |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, United States | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Discuss.io | Maze |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 305 | 164 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -3.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $5.9M | $92.8M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,103 | 41,077 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Discuss.io | Maze |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 32/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Discuss.io | Maze |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Payments | Not detected | Apple PAY |
| Analytics | Not detected | Segment, Facebook Pixel |
Discuss.io vs Maze: common questions
Which is better, Discuss.io or Maze?
On our 0-100 score Maze rates higher (61/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Discuss.io and Maze compare on the numbers?
Discuss.io leads on headcount (305 against 164). Maze leads on our overall score (61/100 against 53/100), domain rating (79/100 against 60/100), funding raised ($92.8M against $5.9M), LinkedIn following (41,077 against 5,103).
Read the full Discuss.io review and pricing or the Maze review and pricing. You can also browse other Discuss.io alternatives we track.