Dig vs NeuroApplied
Dig vs NeuroApplied, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Dig is on 60/100 and NeuroApplied on 38/100.
Where each one leads
Dig
- our overall score: 60/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 124 against 2
- funding raised: $59.0M against $700K
- LinkedIn following: 9,452 against 192
NeuroApplied
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 44/100
At a glance
| Measure | Dig | NeuroApplied |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Social video intelligence platform for brands to understand and control their video-first social media presence. | Applies AI and subconscious insights from online games for customer-focused marketing. |
| Category | Social Media Analytics, Video Intelligence, Brand Monitoring, Marketing Technology | Marketing, Insights, MarTech, AdTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Dig | NeuroApplied |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 124 | 2 |
| Total funding | $59.0M | $700K |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,452 | 192 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Dig | NeuroApplied |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 38/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 34/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 10/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 67/100 | 26/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 40/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Dig | NeuroApplied |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Dig | NeuroApplied |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Video-First Collection, In-Video Analysis, Narrative Extraction, Real-Time Reporting & Alerts, Reputation Intelligence, Consumer & Content Intelligence | Not published |
Dig vs NeuroApplied: common questions
Which is better, Dig or NeuroApplied?
On our 0-100 score Dig rates higher (60/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Dig and NeuroApplied compare on the numbers?
Dig leads on our overall score (60/100 against 38/100), headcount (124 against 2), funding raised ($59.0M against $700K), LinkedIn following (9,452 against 192). NeuroApplied leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 44/100).
Read the full Dig review and pricing or the NeuroApplied review and pricing. You can also browse other Dig alternatives we track.