DiA Imaging Analysis vs Ultrasight
DiA Imaging Analysis vs Ultrasight, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: DiA Imaging Analysis is on 54/100 and Ultrasight on 56/100.
Where each one leads
DiA Imaging Analysis
- domain rating: 30/100 against 27/100
- funding raised: $30.1M against $15.0M
- LinkedIn following: 5,821 against 1,465
Ultrasight
- agent readiness: 32/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 28 against 19
At a glance
| Measure | DiA Imaging Analysis | Ultrasight |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | DiA Imaging Analysis provides AI-powered ultrasound software to automate image analysis for clinicians. | AI-powered real-time guidance and quality assessment for cardiac ultrasound imaging. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Heart Imaging, MedTech | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Ultrasound, Cardiac |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Beer Sheva, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | DiA Imaging Analysis | Ultrasight |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 28 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -15.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $30.1M | $15.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| Valuation | $65.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,821 | 1,465 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | DiA Imaging Analysis | Ultrasight |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 30/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | DiA Imaging Analysis | Ultrasight |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
DiA Imaging Analysis vs Ultrasight: common questions
Which is better, DiA Imaging Analysis or Ultrasight?
On our 0-100 score Ultrasight rates higher (56/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do DiA Imaging Analysis and Ultrasight compare on the numbers?
DiA Imaging Analysis leads on domain rating (30/100 against 27/100), funding raised ($30.1M against $15.0M), LinkedIn following (5,821 against 1,465). Ultrasight leads on agent readiness (32/100 against 22/100), headcount (28 against 19).
Read the full DiA Imaging Analysis review and pricing or the Ultrasight review and pricing. You can also browse other DiA Imaging Analysis alternatives we track.