DiA Imaging Analysis vs Ibex Medical Analytics
DiA Imaging Analysis vs Ibex Medical Analytics, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: DiA Imaging Analysis is on 54/100 and Ibex Medical Analytics on 64/100.
Where each one leads
DiA Imaging Analysis
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Ibex Medical Analytics
- our overall score: 64/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 31/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 52/100 against 30/100
- headcount: 99 against 19
- headcount growth: +17.3% against -15.2%
- funding raised: $104M against $30.1M
- LinkedIn following: 14,109 against 5,821
At a glance
| Measure | DiA Imaging Analysis | Ibex Medical Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | DiA Imaging Analysis provides AI-powered ultrasound software to automate image analysis for clinicians. | AI-powered platform for cancer diagnostics in digital pathology. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Heart Imaging, MedTech | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Pathology, HealthTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Beer Sheva, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | DiA Imaging Analysis | Ibex Medical Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 99 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -15.2% | +17.3% |
| Total funding | $30.1M | $104M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| Valuation | $65.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,821 | 14,109 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | DiA Imaging Analysis | Ibex Medical Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 30/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | DiA Imaging Analysis | Ibex Medical Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
DiA Imaging Analysis vs Ibex Medical Analytics: common questions
Which is better, DiA Imaging Analysis or Ibex Medical Analytics?
On our 0-100 score Ibex Medical Analytics rates higher (64/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do DiA Imaging Analysis and Ibex Medical Analytics compare on the numbers?
Ibex Medical Analytics leads on our overall score (64/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (31/100 against 22/100), domain rating (52/100 against 30/100), headcount (99 against 19), headcount growth (+17.3% against -15.2%), funding raised ($104M against $30.1M), LinkedIn following (14,109 against 5,821).
Read the full DiA Imaging Analysis review and pricing or the Ibex Medical Analytics review and pricing. You can also browse other DiA Imaging Analysis alternatives we track.