DevOcean Technologies vs Magic
DevOcean Technologies vs Magic, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: DevOcean Technologies is on 32/100 and Magic on 65/100.
Where each one leads
DevOcean Technologies
- funding raised: $19.5M against $10.0M
Magic
- our overall score: 65/100 against 32/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 22/100
At a glance
| Measure | DevOcean Technologies | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | DevOcean Technologies is a startup focused on building advanced AI agents for software development. | AI-powered coding agents for automated software engineering tasks. |
| Category | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, Foundation Model | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2022 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | DevOcean Technologies | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 37 |
| Open roles | Not published | 10 |
| Total funding | $19.5M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Not published |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.5B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | DevOcean Technologies | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 32/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 36/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 8/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 56/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | DevOcean Technologies | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
DevOcean Technologies vs Magic: common questions
Which is better, DevOcean Technologies or Magic?
On our 0-100 score Magic rates higher (65/100 against 32/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do DevOcean Technologies and Magic compare on the numbers?
DevOcean Technologies leads on funding raised ($19.5M against $10.0M). Magic leads on our overall score (65/100 against 32/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 22/100).
Read the full DevOcean Technologies review and pricing or the Magic review and pricing. You can also browse other DevOcean Technologies alternatives we track.