Device42 vs Puppet
Device42 vs Puppet, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Device42 is on 57/100 and Puppet on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Device42
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Puppet
- our overall score: 60/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 82/100 against 68/100
- headcount: 184 against 86
- headcount growth: -14.0% against -55.2%
- funding raised: $121M against $37.5M
- LinkedIn following: 60,516 against 7,787
At a glance
| Measure | Device42 | Puppet |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agentless IT discovery and management platform for hybrid IT environments. | Infrastructure automation and operations platform for managing and securing IT infrastructure at scale. |
| Category | IT Asset Management, Data Center Infrastructure Management, IT Operations, Hybrid IT | Infrastructure as Code, Configuration Management, IT Automation, DevOps |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | New Haven, United States | Portland, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Device42 | Puppet |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 86 | 184 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -55.2% | -14.0% |
| Open roles | 100 | Not published |
| Total funding | $37.5M | $121M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series F |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,787 | 60,516 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Device42 | Puppet |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 45/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Device42 | Puppet |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Device42 | Puppet |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 1 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“Data Center Management and Network Management Software from Device42. Device42 is a comprehensive data center and network management software. Loved by organizations around the world for its open APIs and ease of use.”r/
Device42 vs Puppet: common questions
Which is better, Device42 or Puppet?
On our 0-100 score Puppet rates higher (60/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Device42 and Puppet compare on the numbers?
Puppet leads on our overall score (60/100 against 57/100), domain rating (82/100 against 68/100), headcount (184 against 86), headcount growth (-14.0% against -55.2%), funding raised ($121M against $37.5M), LinkedIn following (60,516 against 7,787).
What do real users say about Device42 and Puppet?
Device42: 2 positive and 1 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full Device42 review and pricing or the Puppet review and pricing. You can also browse other Device42 alternatives we track.