Device42 vs Lansweeper
Device42 vs Lansweeper, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Device42 is on 57/100 and Lansweeper on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Device42
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Lansweeper
- agent readiness: 67/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 412 against 86
- funding raised: $158M against $37.5M
- LinkedIn following: 20,591 against 7,787
At a glance
| Measure | Device42 | Lansweeper |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agentless IT discovery and management platform for hybrid IT environments. | Cloud-based IT asset management software provider. |
| Category | IT Asset Management, Data Center Infrastructure Management, IT Operations, Hybrid IT | Not published |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | New Haven, United States | Belgium |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Device42 | Lansweeper |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 86 | 412 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -55.2% | Not published |
| Open roles | 100 | Not published |
| Total funding | $37.5M | $158M |
| Latest round | Series B | Private Equity |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,787 | 20,591 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Device42 | Lansweeper |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | C (67/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Device42 | Lansweeper |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Device42 | Lansweeper |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 1 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“Data Center Management and Network Management Software from Device42. Device42 is a comprehensive data center and network management software. Loved by organizations around the world for its open APIs and ease of use.”r/
Device42 vs Lansweeper: common questions
Which is better, Device42 or Lansweeper?
On our 0-100 score Lansweeper rates higher (59/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Device42 and Lansweeper compare on the numbers?
Lansweeper leads on agent readiness (67/100 against 50/100), headcount (412 against 86), funding raised ($158M against $37.5M), LinkedIn following (20,591 against 7,787).
What do real users say about Device42 and Lansweeper?
Device42: 2 positive and 1 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full Device42 review and pricing or the Lansweeper review and pricing. You can also browse other Device42 alternatives we track.