DermaSensor vs Empatica
DermaSensor vs Empatica, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: DermaSensor is on 43/100 and Empatica on 64/100.
Where each one leads
DermaSensor
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Empatica
- our overall score: 64/100 against 43/100
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 39/100
- funding raised: $170M against $15.0M
- LinkedIn following: 42,805 against 5,977
At a glance
| Measure | DermaSensor | Empatica |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered handheld device for early skin cancer detection, aiding dermatologists. | Wearable devices and AI for continuous health monitoring and early disease detection. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Computer Vision | HealthTech, MedTech, Wearables, Neurotech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware | software | platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Miami, United States | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | DermaSensor | Empatica |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 122 |
| Total funding | $15.0M | $170M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,977 | 42,805 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | DermaSensor | Empatica |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 36/100 | Not published |
| Team | Not published | 36/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 83/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 39/100 | 62/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | DermaSensor | Empatica |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Netlify |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
DermaSensor vs Empatica: common questions
Which is better, DermaSensor or Empatica?
On our 0-100 score Empatica rates higher (64/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do DermaSensor and Empatica compare on the numbers?
Empatica leads on our overall score (64/100 against 43/100), agent readiness (57/100 against 40/100), domain rating (62/100 against 39/100), funding raised ($170M against $15.0M), LinkedIn following (42,805 against 5,977).
Read the full DermaSensor review and pricing or the Empatica review and pricing. You can also browse other DermaSensor alternatives we track.