DermaDetect vs Notal Vision
DermaDetect vs Notal Vision, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: DermaDetect is on 46/100 and Notal Vision on 63/100.
Where each one leads
DermaDetect
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Notal Vision
- our overall score: 63/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 31/100 against 6/100
- headcount: 80 against 5
- headcount growth: -9.3% against -18.5%
- funding raised: $89.0M against $1.5M
- LinkedIn following: 6,317 against 897
At a glance
| Measure | DermaDetect | Notal Vision |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-driven software for remote diagnosis and treatment of skin disorders. | Remote monitoring services for retinal diseases, extending care from clinic to home. |
| Category | Diagnostics, Decision Support, Decision Making, Clinical Trials | Ophthalmology, Age Related Macular Degeneration (AMD), Diagnostics, HealthTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2B2C |
| Offering | Software | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | DermaDetect | Notal Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5 | 80 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -18.5% | -9.3% |
| Total funding | $1.5M | $89.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $220M |
| LinkedIn followers | 897 | 6,317 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | DermaDetect | Notal Vision |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 39/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 6/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | DermaDetect | Notal Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CMS | Wix | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
DermaDetect vs Notal Vision: common questions
Which is better, DermaDetect or Notal Vision?
On our 0-100 score Notal Vision rates higher (63/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do DermaDetect and Notal Vision compare on the numbers?
Notal Vision leads on our overall score (63/100 against 46/100), domain rating (31/100 against 6/100), headcount (80 against 5), headcount growth (-9.3% against -18.5%), funding raised ($89.0M against $1.5M), LinkedIn following (6,317 against 897).
Read the full DermaDetect review and pricing or the Notal Vision review and pricing. You can also browse other DermaDetect alternatives we track.