Deqa vs FeedVisor
Deqa vs FeedVisor, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Deqa is on 35/100 and FeedVisor on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Deqa
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
FeedVisor
- our overall score: 58/100 against 35/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 64 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 11,648 against 35
At a glance
| Measure | Deqa | FeedVisor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Deqa provides Amazon sellers with tools to discover and launch winning products before competitors. | An AI-first optimization and intelligence platform for large sellers and brands on Amazon, providing pricing, advertising, and inventory solutions. |
| Category | Amazon, E-commerce, Marketplace Tools, Amazon FBA | Retail, Pricing, RetailTech, E-commerce |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Not published | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Deqa | FeedVisor |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 64 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -8.7% |
| Open roles | Not published | 2 |
| Total funding | Not published | $42.7M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 35 | 11,648 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Deqa | FeedVisor |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 35/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 7/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 40/100 |
| Search visibility | 18/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Deqa | FeedVisor |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Deqa | FeedVisor |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 2 negative across 3 threads |
“Feedvisor is an Amazon repricer that does help with the algorythm repricer analyzes giving you a full 24/7 landscape of your competitors. While setting your profits goals, their algorythm would work to give you a pretty close bias approach ”r/AmazonTools
Deqa vs FeedVisor: common questions
Which is better, Deqa or FeedVisor?
On our 0-100 score FeedVisor rates higher (58/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Deqa and FeedVisor compare on the numbers?
FeedVisor leads on our overall score (58/100 against 35/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 22/100), headcount (64 against 2), LinkedIn following (11,648 against 35).
What do real users say about Deqa and FeedVisor?
FeedVisor: 1 positive and 2 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/AmazonTools.
Read the full Deqa review and pricing or the FeedVisor review and pricing. You can also browse other Deqa alternatives we track.