Deputy vs Harri
Deputy vs Harri, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Deputy is on 63/100 and Harri on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Deputy
- our overall score: 63/100 against 58/100
- agent readiness: 69/100 against 25/100
- funding raised: $106M against $80.0M
Harri
- headcount: 641 against 474
- headcount growth: +16.3% against -7.8%
At a glance
| Measure | Deputy | Harri |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | All-in-one people platform for hourly work, managing scheduling, HR, and payroll. | Harri provides a comprehensive Human Capital Management (HCM) platform for frontline employees in the hospitality and service sectors. |
| Category | HR Tech, Workforce Management, Employee Scheduling, Payroll Software | HR Tech, Workforce Management, Talent Acquisition, Employee Engagement |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2008 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Deputy | Harri |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 474 | 641 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -7.8% | +16.3% |
| Total funding | $106M | $80.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 34,217 | 40,683 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Deputy | Harri |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (69/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Deputy | Harri |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Nuxt, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Deputy vs Harri: common questions
Which is better, Deputy or Harri?
On our 0-100 score Deputy rates higher (63/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Deputy and Harri compare on the numbers?
Deputy leads on our overall score (63/100 against 58/100), agent readiness (69/100 against 25/100), funding raised ($106M against $80.0M). Harri leads on headcount (641 against 474), headcount growth (+16.3% against -7.8%).
Read the full Deputy review and pricing or the Harri review and pricing. You can also browse other Deputy alternatives we track.