Dependencywatch vs RedAccess
Dependencywatch vs RedAccess, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Dependencywatch is on 7/100 and RedAccess on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Dependencywatch
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 32/100
RedAccess
- our overall score: 46/100 against 7/100
At a glance
| Measure | Dependencywatch | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Free, in-browser tool to scan lockfiles for known security vulnerabilities in npm/PyPI dependencies. | Cybersecurity firm specializing in discovering publicly accessible assets and shadow AI risks. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Developer Tools, Open Source, Security | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Cloud Security, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | Not published | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Dependencywatch | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 46 |
| Total funding | Not published | $1.5M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 2,863 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Dependencywatch | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 7/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 48/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (54/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Dependencywatch | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Self Managed |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Dependencywatch vs RedAccess: common questions
Which is better, Dependencywatch or RedAccess?
On our 0-100 score RedAccess rates higher (46/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Dependencywatch and RedAccess compare on the numbers?
Dependencywatch leads on agent readiness (54/100 against 32/100). RedAccess leads on our overall score (46/100 against 7/100).
Read the full Dependencywatch review and pricing or the RedAccess review and pricing. You can also browse other Dependencywatch alternatives we track.