Denodo vs Silk
Denodo vs Silk, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Denodo is on 22/100 and Silk on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Denodo
- agent readiness: 30/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 793 against 490
- LinkedIn following: 73,782 against 5,024
Silk
- our overall score: 63/100 against 22/100
At a glance
| Measure | Denodo | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Denodo is a leader in data virtualization, enabling unified access to diverse data sources. | Silk provides a data virtualization platform for cloud workloads, accelerating performance without refactoring. |
| Category | Data Virtualization, Data Management, Data Integration, Data Governance | Database, Enterprise, Optimization, Virtualization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 1999 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, United States | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Denodo | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 793 | 490 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +25.0% |
| Total funding | Not published | $238M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series G |
| Valuation | Not published | $550M |
| LinkedIn followers | 73,782 | 5,024 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Denodo | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 22/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Denodo | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Google Cloud |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Denodo vs Silk: common questions
Which is better, Denodo or Silk?
On our 0-100 score Silk rates higher (63/100 against 22/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Denodo and Silk compare on the numbers?
Denodo leads on agent readiness (30/100 against 21/100), domain rating (73/100 against 50/100), headcount (793 against 490), LinkedIn following (73,782 against 5,024). Silk leads on our overall score (63/100 against 22/100).
Read the full Denodo review and pricing or the Silk review and pricing. You can also browse other Denodo alternatives we track.