Google DeepMind vs Thinking AI Labs
Google DeepMind vs Thinking AI Labs, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Google DeepMind is on 83/100 and Thinking AI Labs on 10/100.
Where each one leads
Google DeepMind
- our overall score: 83/100 against 10/100
- domain rating: 89/100 against 8/100
Thinking AI Labs
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 34/100
At a glance
| Measure | Google DeepMind | Thinking AI Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Pioneering AI research and development to solve intelligence and advance science for humanity. | Develops advanced AI agents for complex reasoning and task execution. |
| Category | Frontier AI Lab, AGI Research, Foundation Model, Generative AI | Frontier AI Lab, AGI Research, Foundation Model, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2010 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Google DeepMind | Thinking AI Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8,831 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +37.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $677M | Not published |
| Latest round | Acquisition | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,587,690 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Google DeepMind | Thinking AI Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 83/100 | 10/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 33/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 71/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 97/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 89/100 | 8/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Google DeepMind | Thinking AI Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Google DeepMind | Thinking AI Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 5 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Google Gemini is a family of multimodal large language models developed by Google DeepMind, serving as the successor to LaMDA and PaLM 2.”r/
Google DeepMind vs Thinking AI Labs: common questions
Which is better, Google DeepMind or Thinking AI Labs?
On our 0-100 score Google DeepMind rates higher (83/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Google DeepMind and Thinking AI Labs compare on the numbers?
Google DeepMind leads on our overall score (83/100 against 10/100), domain rating (89/100 against 8/100). Thinking AI Labs leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 34/100).
What do real users say about Google DeepMind and Thinking AI Labs?
Google DeepMind: 5 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full Google DeepMind review and pricing or the Thinking AI Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other Google DeepMind alternatives we track.