DeepKeep vs RedAccess
DeepKeep vs RedAccess, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: DeepKeep is on 50/100 and RedAccess on 46/100.
Where each one leads
DeepKeep
- our overall score: 50/100 against 46/100
- funding raised: $10.0M against $1.5M
- LinkedIn following: 6,110 against 2,863
RedAccess
- agent readiness: 32/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | DeepKeep | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity platform leveraging generative AI for proactive threat detection and response. | Cybersecurity firm specializing in discovering publicly accessible assets and shadow AI risks. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Generative AI, Artificial Intelligence, Threat Detection | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Cloud Security, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2020 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | DeepKeep | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 38 | 46 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +60.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $1.5M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,110 | 2,863 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | DeepKeep | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 52/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | DeepKeep | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
DeepKeep vs RedAccess: common questions
Which is better, DeepKeep or RedAccess?
On our 0-100 score DeepKeep rates higher (50/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do DeepKeep and RedAccess compare on the numbers?
DeepKeep leads on our overall score (50/100 against 46/100), funding raised ($10.0M against $1.5M), LinkedIn following (6,110 against 2,863). RedAccess leads on agent readiness (32/100 against 21/100).
Read the full DeepKeep review and pricing or the RedAccess review and pricing. You can also browse other DeepKeep alternatives we track.