DeepCube vs Habana Labs
DeepCube vs Habana Labs, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: DeepCube is on 55/100 and Habana Labs on 66/100.
Where each one leads
DeepCube
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Habana Labs
- our overall score: 66/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 28/100
- domain rating: 66/100 against 9/100
- headcount: 212 against 11
- headcount growth: +76.7% against +15.2%
- funding raised: $105M against $7.0M
- LinkedIn following: 11,760 against 748
At a glance
| Measure | DeepCube | Habana Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Software-based inference accelerator to improve deep learning performance on existing hardware. | Develops AI and Deep Learning processors for data centers and cloud environments. |
| Category | Computing, Data Center, Edge Computing, Acceleration | Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Data Center, Training |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | DeepCube | Habana Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 11 | 212 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +15.2% | +76.7% |
| Total funding | $7.0M | $105M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 748 | 11,760 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | DeepCube | Habana Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 45/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (28/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 9/100 | 66/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | DeepCube | Habana Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
DeepCube vs Habana Labs: common questions
Which is better, DeepCube or Habana Labs?
On our 0-100 score Habana Labs rates higher (66/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do DeepCube and Habana Labs compare on the numbers?
Habana Labs leads on our overall score (66/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 28/100), domain rating (66/100 against 9/100), headcount (212 against 11), headcount growth (+76.7% against +15.2%), funding raised ($105M against $7.0M), LinkedIn following (11,760 against 748).
Read the full DeepCube review and pricing or the Habana Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other DeepCube alternatives we track.