Entitle vs Exabeam
Entitle vs Exabeam, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Entitle is on 55/100 and Exabeam on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Entitle
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Exabeam
- our overall score: 69/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 794 against 23
- funding raised: $390M against $15.0M
- LinkedIn following: 51,918 against 3,847
At a glance
| Measure | Entitle | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Simplifies granular and temporary access for cloud-intensive companies, reducing risk. | Exabeam provides a cloud-native cybersecurity platform combining SIEM and UEBA to detect, investigate, and respond to threats using AI. |
| Category | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), Identity Management, Cloud Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Information Technology (IT) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Foster City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Entitle | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 23 | 794 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +2.8% |
| Total funding | $15.0M | $390M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,847 | 51,918 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Entitle | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 36/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Entitle | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Matomo |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Entitle vs Exabeam: common questions
Which is better, Entitle or Exabeam?
On our 0-100 score Exabeam rates higher (69/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Entitle and Exabeam compare on the numbers?
Exabeam leads on our overall score (69/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 21/100), domain rating (76/100 against 36/100), headcount (794 against 23), funding raised ($390M against $15.0M), LinkedIn following (51,918 against 3,847).
Read the full Entitle review and pricing or the Exabeam review and pricing. You can also browse other Entitle alternatives we track.