Swish.ai vs Exabeam
Swish.ai vs Exabeam, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Swish.ai is on 63/100 and Exabeam on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Swish.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Exabeam
- our overall score: 69/100 against 63/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 20/100
- headcount: 794 against 25
- headcount growth: +2.8% against -11.6%
- funding raised: $390M against $52.6M
- LinkedIn following: 51,918 against 3,490
At a glance
| Measure | Swish.ai | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Hyperautomation intelligence for reinventing ITSM delivery with AI and NLP. | Exabeam provides a cloud-native cybersecurity platform combining SIEM and UEBA to detect, investigate, and respond to threats using AI. |
| Category | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), ITSM, Hyperautomation | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Information Technology (IT) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Foster City, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Swish.ai | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 25 | 794 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -11.6% | +2.8% |
| Total funding | $52.6M | $390M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,490 | 51,918 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Swish.ai | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 43/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 20/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Swish.ai | Exabeam |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Matomo |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Swish.ai vs Exabeam: common questions
Which is better, Swish.ai or Exabeam?
On our 0-100 score Exabeam rates higher (69/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Swish.ai and Exabeam compare on the numbers?
Exabeam leads on our overall score (69/100 against 63/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 42/100), domain rating (76/100 against 20/100), headcount (794 against 25), headcount growth (+2.8% against -11.6%), funding raised ($390M against $52.6M), LinkedIn following (51,918 against 3,490).
Read the full Swish.ai review and pricing or the Exabeam review and pricing. You can also browse other Swish.ai alternatives we track.