Deep Genomics vs Insitro
Deep Genomics vs Insitro, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Deep Genomics is on 61/100 and Insitro on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Deep Genomics
- headcount growth: +19.3% against +10.9%
Insitro
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 64/100 against 54/100
- headcount: 255 against 110
- LinkedIn following: 42,173 against 30,891
At a glance
| Measure | Deep Genomics | Insitro |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered biotechnology company developing RNA therapeutics for genetic diseases. | Data-driven drug discovery and development company using machine learning and high-throughput biology. |
| Category | Biotech, Drug Discovery, Genomics, AI-Driven Drug Discovery | Healthcare, Drug Discovery, Drug Development, DNA |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Toronto, Canada | South San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Deep Genomics | Insitro |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 110 | 255 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +19.3% | +10.9% |
| Total funding | $241M | $243M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $7.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 30,891 | 42,173 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Deep Genomics | Insitro |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 62/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 54/100 | 64/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Deep Genomics | Insitro |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Segment | Not detected |
Deep Genomics vs Insitro: common questions
Which is better, Deep Genomics or Insitro?
On our 0-100 score Insitro rates higher (62/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Deep Genomics and Insitro compare on the numbers?
Deep Genomics leads on headcount growth (+19.3% against +10.9%). Insitro leads on agent readiness (40/100 against 35/100), domain rating (64/100 against 54/100), headcount (255 against 110), LinkedIn following (42,173 against 30,891).
Read the full Deep Genomics review and pricing or the Insitro review and pricing. You can also browse other Deep Genomics alternatives we track.