Dedrone vs Fortem Technologies
Dedrone vs Fortem Technologies, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Dedrone is on 53/100 and Fortem Technologies on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Dedrone
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 231 against 135
- LinkedIn following: 24,387 against 11,041
Fortem Technologies
- our overall score: 63/100 against 53/100
- funding raised: $107M against $30.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Dedrone | Fortem Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Drone security platform detecting, identifying, and mitigating drone threats. | Develops AI-powered airspace security and defense solutions for drone threats. |
| Category | Defense Tech, Drones, Drone Technology, Security | Defense Tech, Drones, Drone Technology, Robotics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software | hardware | services |
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Lindon, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Dedrone | Fortem Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 231 | 135 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +100.2% |
| Total funding | $30.0M | $107M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 24,387 | 11,041 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Dedrone | Fortem Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 43/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Dedrone | Fortem Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Dedrone vs Fortem Technologies: common questions
Which is better, Dedrone or Fortem Technologies?
On our 0-100 score Fortem Technologies rates higher (63/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Dedrone and Fortem Technologies compare on the numbers?
Dedrone leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 39/100), domain rating (59/100 against 43/100), headcount (231 against 135), LinkedIn following (24,387 against 11,041). Fortem Technologies leads on our overall score (63/100 against 53/100), funding raised ($107M against $30.0M).
Read the full Dedrone review and pricing or the Fortem Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other Dedrone alternatives we track.