Decodea vs H2O.ai
Decodea vs H2O.ai, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Decodea is on 33/100 and H2O.ai on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Decodea
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
H2O.ai
- our overall score: 64/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 77/100 against 4/100
- headcount: 352 against 4
- LinkedIn following: 155,295 against 45
At a glance
| Measure | Decodea | H2O.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI company developing explainable AI and improving reinforcement learning algorithms. | An open-source AI and machine learning platform for enterprises. |
| Category | Explainable AI, Gaming, Chess, Reinforcement Learning | Foundation Model, Generative AI, Large Language Model, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Mountain View, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Decodea | H2O.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4 | 352 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +5.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $228M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series E |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.7B |
| LinkedIn followers | 45 | 155,295 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Decodea | H2O.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 33/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 7/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 4/100 | 77/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Decodea | H2O.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Decodea vs H2O.ai: common questions
Which is better, Decodea or H2O.ai?
On our 0-100 score H2O.ai rates higher (64/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Decodea and H2O.ai compare on the numbers?
H2O.ai leads on our overall score (64/100 against 33/100), domain rating (77/100 against 4/100), headcount (352 against 4), LinkedIn following (155,295 against 45).
Read the full Decodea review and pricing or the H2O.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Decodea alternatives we track.