Dcycle vs Material Evolution
Dcycle vs Material Evolution, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Dcycle is on 49/100 and Material Evolution on 42/100.
Where each one leads
Dcycle
- our overall score: 49/100 against 42/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 46/100 against 35/100
Material Evolution
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Dcycle | Material Evolution |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | UK- and Spain-based sustainability data platform. | Developing ultra-low carbon cement using AI-driven alkali-fusion technology from industrial waste. |
| Category | Sustainability, Data Platform, ESG Data Management, Carbon Accounting | Sustainability, Construction Tech, Materials Science, AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2020 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Madrid, Spain | Middlesbrough, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Dcycle | Material Evolution |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 58 | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $22.3M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,852 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Dcycle | Material Evolution |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 42/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 37/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 8/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 35/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Dcycle | Material Evolution |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Dcycle vs Material Evolution: common questions
Which is better, Dcycle or Material Evolution?
On our 0-100 score Dcycle rates higher (49/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Dcycle and Material Evolution compare on the numbers?
Dcycle leads on our overall score (49/100 against 42/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 21/100), domain rating (46/100 against 35/100).
Read the full Dcycle review and pricing or the Material Evolution review and pricing. You can also browse other Dcycle alternatives we track.