Dcycle vs inoqo
Dcycle vs inoqo, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Dcycle is on 49/100 and inoqo on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Dcycle
- our overall score: 49/100 against 46/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 46/100 against 32/100
- LinkedIn following: 8,852 against 3,378
inoqo
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Dcycle | inoqo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | UK- and Spain-based sustainability data platform. | Sustainability data and analytics platform |
| Category | Sustainability, Data Platform, ESG Data Management, Carbon Accounting | Sustainability, ESG, Data Analytics, SaaS |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2020 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Madrid, Spain | Vienna, Austria |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Dcycle | inoqo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 58 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -82.5% |
| Total funding | Not published | $2.9M |
| Latest round | Not published | Grant (prize money) |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,852 | 3,378 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Dcycle | inoqo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 32/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 32/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Dcycle | inoqo |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Dcycle vs inoqo: common questions
Which is better, Dcycle or inoqo?
On our 0-100 score Dcycle rates higher (49/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Dcycle and inoqo compare on the numbers?
Dcycle leads on our overall score (49/100 against 46/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 36/100), domain rating (46/100 against 32/100), LinkedIn following (8,852 against 3,378).
Read the full Dcycle review and pricing or the inoqo review and pricing. You can also browse other Dcycle alternatives we track.