DBeaver vs Supabase
DBeaver vs Supabase, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: DBeaver is on 52/100 and Supabase on 70/100.
Where each one leads
DBeaver
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Supabase
- our overall score: 70/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 78/100
- funding raised: $933M against $6.0M
At a glance
| Measure | DBeaver | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A universal database management tool for developers and database administrators, supporting a wide range of databases. | Open source Firebase alternative with a PostgreSQL backend and real-time capabilities. |
| Category | Database Management, Developer Tools, Data Platform, SQL Client | Database, Backend as a Service, Developer Tools, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2010 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | DBeaver | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 342 |
| Total funding | $6.0M | $933M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $11B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 99,093 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | DBeaver | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 11/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 72/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | C (66/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | DBeaver | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
DBeaver vs Supabase: common questions
Which is better, DBeaver or Supabase?
On our 0-100 score Supabase rates higher (70/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do DBeaver and Supabase compare on the numbers?
Supabase leads on our overall score (70/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 22/100), domain rating (91/100 against 78/100), funding raised ($933M against $6.0M).
Read the full DBeaver review and pricing or the Supabase review and pricing. You can also browse other DBeaver alternatives we track.