Dazz vs Mend
Dazz vs Mend, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Dazz is on 69/100 and Mend on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Dazz
- our overall score: 69/100 against 61/100
- headcount growth: +13.7% against -8.7%
Mend
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 45/100
- headcount: 257 against 52
- LinkedIn following: 34,019 against 16,482
At a glance
| Measure | Dazz | Mend |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automated remediation for security and development teams, fixing code flaws with one-click fixes. | Mend.io provides application security and open-source software management solutions to help organizations reduce risk and accelerate development. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Development, Vulnerability | Open Source, Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Development |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Dazz | Mend |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 52 | 257 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +13.7% | -8.7% |
| Total funding | $125M | $122M |
| Latest round | Series B | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $380M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 16,482 | 34,019 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Dazz | Mend |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 84/100 | 77/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Dazz | Mend |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Dazz vs Mend: common questions
Which is better, Dazz or Mend?
On our 0-100 score Dazz rates higher (69/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Dazz and Mend compare on the numbers?
Dazz leads on our overall score (69/100 against 61/100), headcount growth (+13.7% against -8.7%). Mend leads on agent readiness (54/100 against 45/100), headcount (257 against 52), LinkedIn following (34,019 against 16,482).
Read the full Dazz review and pricing or the Mend review and pricing. You can also browse other Dazz alternatives we track.