Datricks vs Findings
Datricks vs Findings, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Datricks is on 56/100 and Findings on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Datricks
- headcount growth: +36.7% against +12.9%
- funding raised: $15.0M against $5.0M
- LinkedIn following: 5,109 against 3,549
Findings
- our overall score: 59/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 34/100 against 26/100
At a glance
| Measure | Datricks | Findings |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | SaaS solution for continuous financial compliance and risk mining. | Automates enterprise vendor risk assessment and supply chain security and ESG processes. |
| Category | Enterprise, RPA, Business Intelligence, Compliance | Enterprise, Vendor Management, Supply Chain, Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Datricks | Findings |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 34 | 37 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +36.7% | +12.9% |
| Total funding | $15.0M | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,109 | 3,549 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Datricks | Findings |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 26/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Datricks | Findings |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Google Cloud |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Datricks vs Findings: common questions
Which is better, Datricks or Findings?
On our 0-100 score Findings rates higher (59/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Datricks and Findings compare on the numbers?
Datricks leads on headcount growth (+36.7% against +12.9%), funding raised ($15.0M against $5.0M), LinkedIn following (5,109 against 3,549). Findings leads on our overall score (59/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 35/100), domain rating (34/100 against 26/100).
Read the full Datricks review and pricing or the Findings review and pricing. You can also browse other Datricks alternatives we track.