IBM vs Tufin
IBM vs Tufin, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: IBM is on 60/100 and Tufin on 63/100.
Where each one leads
IBM
- domain rating: 92/100 against 72/100
- funding raised: $245M against $38.0M
- LinkedIn following: 91,507 against 52,901
Tufin
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 506 against 298
At a glance
| Measure | IBM | Tufin |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | IBM is a global technology and consulting company that provides integrated solutions and services, including cloud, AI, software, and hardware. | Tufin provides a security policy management platform that automates and analyzes network security for large, complex enterprise networks. |
| Category | Enterprise Software, Cloud Infrastructure, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Policy Management, Compliance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | Armonk, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | IBM | Tufin |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 298 | 506 |
| Total funding | $245M | $38.0M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series C |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 91,507 | 52,901 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | IBM | Tufin |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 63/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | IBM | Tufin |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery, Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager |
IBM vs Tufin: common questions
Which is better, IBM or Tufin?
On our 0-100 score Tufin rates higher (63/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do IBM and Tufin compare on the numbers?
IBM leads on domain rating (92/100 against 72/100), funding raised ($245M against $38.0M), LinkedIn following (91,507 against 52,901). Tufin leads on agent readiness (40/100 against 31/100), headcount (506 against 298).
Read the full IBM review and pricing or the Tufin review and pricing. You can also browse other IBM alternatives we track.