IBM vs Rainmaking
IBM vs Rainmaking, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: IBM is on 60/100 and Rainmaking on 18/100.
Where each one leads
IBM
- our overall score: 60/100 against 18/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 298 against 115
Rainmaking
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 31/100
At a glance
| Measure | IBM | Rainmaking |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | IBM is a global technology and consulting company that provides integrated solutions and services, including cloud, AI, software, and hardware. | Corporate innovation and venture development firm helping organizations build, accelerate, and scale new businesses. |
| Category | Enterprise Software, Cloud Infrastructure, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning | Corporate Innovation, Venture Development, Venture Building, Consulting |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2010 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Armonk, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | IBM | Rainmaking |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 298 | 115 |
| Total funding | $245M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series E | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 91,507 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | IBM | Rainmaking |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 18/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 63/100 | 9/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | IBM | Rainmaking |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Google Cloud |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Microsoft Clarity | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
IBM vs Rainmaking: common questions
Which is better, IBM or Rainmaking?
On our 0-100 score IBM rates higher (60/100 against 18/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do IBM and Rainmaking compare on the numbers?
IBM leads on our overall score (60/100 against 18/100), domain rating (92/100 against 52/100), headcount (298 against 115). Rainmaking leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 31/100).
Read the full IBM review and pricing or the Rainmaking review and pricing. You can also browse other IBM alternatives we track.