IBM vs QRA Corp
IBM vs QRA Corp, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: IBM is on 60/100 and QRA Corp on 51/100.
Where each one leads
IBM
- our overall score: 60/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 46/100
- headcount: 298 against 18
- funding raised: $245M against $10.8M
- LinkedIn following: 91,507 against 3,561
QRA Corp
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 31/100
At a glance
| Measure | IBM | QRA Corp |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | IBM is a global technology and consulting company that provides integrated solutions and services, including cloud, AI, software, and hardware. | QRA Corp develops AI-powered software for requirements analysis in complex engineering. |
| Category | Enterprise Software, Cloud Infrastructure, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning | Enterprise Software, Automation, Compliance, Engineering Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Armonk, United States | Halifax, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | IBM | QRA Corp |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 298 | 18 |
| Total funding | $245M | $10.8M |
| Latest round | Series E | Pre-Series A |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 91,507 | 3,561 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | IBM | QRA Corp |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 63/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 46/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | IBM | QRA Corp |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
IBM vs QRA Corp: common questions
Which is better, IBM or QRA Corp?
On our 0-100 score IBM rates higher (60/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do IBM and QRA Corp compare on the numbers?
IBM leads on our overall score (60/100 against 51/100), domain rating (92/100 against 46/100), headcount (298 against 18), funding raised ($245M against $10.8M), LinkedIn following (91,507 against 3,561). QRA Corp leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 31/100).
Read the full IBM review and pricing or the QRA Corp review and pricing. You can also browse other IBM alternatives we track.