IBM vs Qdrant
IBM vs Qdrant, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: IBM is on 60/100 and Qdrant on 71/100.
Where each one leads
IBM
- domain rating: 92/100 against 78/100
- headcount: 298 against 145
- funding raised: $245M against $96.5M
- LinkedIn following: 91,507 against 61,051
Qdrant
- our overall score: 71/100 against 60/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 31/100
At a glance
| Measure | IBM | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | IBM is a global technology and consulting company that provides integrated solutions and services, including cloud, AI, software, and hardware. | High-performance, open-source vector search engine built in Rust for production-grade AI and machine learning workloads. |
| Category | Enterprise Software, Cloud Infrastructure, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning | Vector Database, Vector Search Engine, Open Source, AI Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Armonk, United States | Berlin, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | IBM | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 298 | 145 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +111.8% |
| Total funding | $245M | $96.5M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 91,507 | 61,051 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | IBM | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 63/100 | 59/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 79/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | IBM | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | Netlify |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
IBM vs Qdrant: common questions
Which is better, IBM or Qdrant?
On our 0-100 score Qdrant rates higher (71/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do IBM and Qdrant compare on the numbers?
IBM leads on domain rating (92/100 against 78/100), headcount (298 against 145), funding raised ($245M against $96.5M), LinkedIn following (91,507 against 61,051). Qdrant leads on our overall score (71/100 against 60/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 31/100).
Read the full IBM review and pricing or the Qdrant review and pricing. You can also browse other IBM alternatives we track.