IBM vs EAxpertise
IBM vs EAxpertise, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: IBM is on 60/100 and EAxpertise on Not scored yet.
Where each one leads
IBM
- agent readiness: 31/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 10/100
- headcount: 298 against 8
EAxpertise
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | IBM | EAxpertise |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | IBM is a global technology and consulting company that provides integrated solutions and services, including cloud, AI, software, and hardware. | EAxpertise is a Netherlands-based enterprise architecture consultancy and partner for Sparx Systems, offering expertise in Enterprise Architect and Prolaborate software. |
| Category | Enterprise Software, Cloud Infrastructure, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning | Enterprise Software, Consulting, Architecture |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B Services |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2010 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Armonk, United States | Netherlands, Netherlands |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | IBM | EAxpertise |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 298 | 8 |
| Total funding | $245M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series E | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 91,507 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | IBM | EAxpertise |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | Not published |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 50/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 63/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 10/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | IBM | EAxpertise |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager |
IBM vs EAxpertise: common questions
Which is better, IBM or EAxpertise?
On our 0-100 score IBM rates higher (60/100 against Not scored yet). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do IBM and EAxpertise compare on the numbers?
IBM leads on agent readiness (31/100 against 22/100), domain rating (92/100 against 10/100), headcount (298 against 8).
Read the full IBM review and pricing or the EAxpertise review and pricing. You can also browse other IBM alternatives we track.