DataDome vs HUMAN Security (HUMAN Sightline Cyberfraud Defense, MediaGuard)
DataDome vs HUMAN Security (HUMAN Sightline Cyberfraud Defense, MediaGuard), compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: DataDome is on 62/100 and HUMAN Security (HUMAN Sightline Cyberfraud Defense, MediaGuard) on 64/100.
Where each one leads
DataDome
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
HUMAN Security (HUMAN Sightline Cyberfraud Defense, MediaGuard)
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 519 against 212
- funding raised: $753M against $77.0M
At a glance
| Measure | DataDome | HUMAN Security (HUMAN Sightline Cyberfraud Defense, MediaGuard) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered bot and online fraud protection. | Verifies digital interactions to distinguish humans from bots and AI, protecting against fraud and abuse. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, SaaS | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, AdTech, Fraud Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | New York, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | DataDome | HUMAN Security (HUMAN Sightline Cyberfraud Defense, MediaGuard) |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 212 | 519 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -1.9% |
| Total funding | $77.0M | $753M |
| Latest round | Series C | Growth Funding |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 40,021 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | DataDome | HUMAN Security (HUMAN Sightline Cyberfraud Defense, MediaGuard) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 8/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | DataDome | HUMAN Security (HUMAN Sightline Cyberfraud Defense, MediaGuard) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
DataDome vs HUMAN Security (HUMAN Sightline Cyberfraud Defense, MediaGuard): common questions
Which is better, DataDome or HUMAN Security (HUMAN Sightline Cyberfraud Defense, MediaGuard)?
On our 0-100 score HUMAN Security (HUMAN Sightline Cyberfraud Defense, MediaGuard) rates higher (64/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do DataDome and HUMAN Security (HUMAN Sightline Cyberfraud Defense, MediaGuard) compare on the numbers?
HUMAN Security (HUMAN Sightline Cyberfraud Defense, MediaGuard) leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 37/100), headcount (519 against 212), funding raised ($753M against $77.0M).
Read the full DataDome review and pricing or the HUMAN Security (HUMAN Sightline Cyberfraud Defense, MediaGuard) review and pricing. You can also browse other DataDome alternatives we track.