Datadog vs Groundcover
Datadog vs Groundcover, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Datadog is on 67/100 and Groundcover on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Datadog
- domain rating: 88/100 against 68/100
- headcount: 4,200 against 129
- funding raised: $794M against $155M
Groundcover
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 43/100
At a glance
| Measure | Datadog | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud monitoring and observability platform for infrastructure and application performance. | Kubernetes application monitoring using eBPF for deep visibility and performance insights, offering a cloud-native observability platform. |
| Category | DevOps, Cloud Computing, Monitoring, Enterprise | Observability, Cloud Infrastructure, Application Performance Monitoring, Infrastructure Monitoring |
| Sells toBusiness model | Not published | B2B |
| Offering | SaaS | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2010 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Datadog | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4,200 | 129 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +65.9% |
| Total funding | $794M | $155M |
| Latest round | IPO | Series C |
| Valuation | $7.8B | $500M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 9,827 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Datadog | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 44/100 | 51/100 |
| Quality | 88/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 88/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Datadog | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Datadog | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“We’re part of the founding engineering team at groundcover, building a modern, cloud-native observability platform that’s redefining how teams monitor and troubleshoot applications in Kubernetes environments. Our engineering efforts focus o”r/devops
Datadog vs Groundcover: common questions
Which is better, Datadog or Groundcover?
On our 0-100 score Datadog rates higher (67/100 against 64/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Datadog and Groundcover compare on the numbers?
Datadog leads on domain rating (88/100 against 68/100), headcount (4,200 against 129), funding raised ($794M against $155M). Groundcover leads on agent readiness (52/100 against 43/100).
What do real users say about Datadog and Groundcover?
Groundcover: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/devops.
Read the full Datadog review and pricing or the Groundcover review and pricing. You can also browse other Datadog alternatives we track.