Databricks vs Starburst
Databricks vs Starburst, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Databricks is on 82/100 and Starburst on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Databricks
- our overall score: 82/100 against 67/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 88/100 against 74/100
- headcount: 15,082 against 537
- funding raised: $37B against $414M
- LinkedIn following: 1,191,281 against 50,638
Starburst
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Databricks | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A unified data analytics and AI platform built on the lakehouse architecture. | Data platform for apps and AI, unifying distributed data for analytics and AI innovation. |
| Category | Data Analytics, Machine Learning, Cloud Computing, Data Platform | AI, AI Infrastructure, Analytics, Analytics Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Databricks | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15,082 | 537 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +27.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $37B | $414M |
| Latest round | Strategic Financing | Series D |
| Valuation | $190B | $3.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,191,281 | 50,638 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Databricks | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 82/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 25/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 69/100 | 48/100 |
| Quality | 96/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 88/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Databricks | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Databricks | Starburst |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 3.5/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
Databricks vs Starburst: common questions
Which is better, Databricks or Starburst?
On our 0-100 score Databricks rates higher (82/100 against 67/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Databricks and Starburst compare on the numbers?
Databricks leads on our overall score (82/100 against 67/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 40/100), domain rating (88/100 against 74/100), headcount (15,082 against 537), funding raised ($37B against $414M), LinkedIn following (1,191,281 against 50,638).
Read the full Databricks review and pricing or the Starburst review and pricing. You can also browse other Databricks alternatives we track.