Databricks vs SQream
Databricks vs SQream, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Databricks is on 82/100 and SQream on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Databricks
- our overall score: 82/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 88/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 15,082 against 42
- headcount growth: +27.1% against -27.8%
- funding raised: $37B against $118M
- LinkedIn following: 1,191,281 against 13,741
SQream
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Databricks | SQream |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A unified data analytics and AI platform built on the lakehouse architecture. | SQream provides a GPU-accelerated data analytics platform for rapidly analyzing massive datasets at scale. |
| Category | Data Analytics, Machine Learning, Cloud Computing, Data Platform | Analytics, Enterprise, SQL, Database |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Databricks | SQream |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15,082 | 42 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +27.1% | -27.8% |
| Total funding | $37B | $118M |
| Latest round | Strategic Financing | Series C |
| Valuation | $190B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,191,281 | 13,741 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Databricks | SQream |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 82/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 25/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 69/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 96/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 88/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Databricks | SQream |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Databricks | SQream |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 3.5/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 6 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“Why SQream uses Haskell.”r/haskell
Databricks vs SQream: common questions
Which is better, Databricks or SQream?
On our 0-100 score Databricks rates higher (82/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Databricks and SQream compare on the numbers?
Databricks leads on our overall score (82/100 against 48/100), domain rating (88/100 against 52/100), headcount (15,082 against 42), headcount growth (+27.1% against -27.8%), funding raised ($37B against $118M), LinkedIn following (1,191,281 against 13,741).
What do real users say about Databricks and SQream?
SQream: 6 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/haskell.
Read the full Databricks review and pricing or the SQream review and pricing. You can also browse other Databricks alternatives we track.