Databricks vs Julia
Databricks vs Julia, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Databricks is on 82/100 and Julia on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Databricks
- our overall score: 82/100 against 61/100
- domain rating: 88/100 against 79/100
- funding raised: $37B against $15.0M
Julia
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Databricks | Julia |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A unified data analytics and AI platform built on the lakehouse architecture. | A high-performance, dynamic programming language for technical computing. |
| Category | Data Analytics, Machine Learning, Cloud Computing, Data Platform | Programming Languages, High-Performance Computing, Data Science, Machine Learning |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Waltham, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Databricks | Julia |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15,082 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +27.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $37B | $15.0M |
| Latest round | Strategic Financing | Series A |
| Valuation | $190B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,191,281 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Databricks | Julia |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 82/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 36/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 25/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 69/100 | 13/100 |
| Quality | 96/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 88/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Databricks | Julia |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Fastly |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Plausible |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Databricks | Julia |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 3.5/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“The Julia Language Subreddit. Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments.”r/
Databricks vs Julia: common questions
Which is better, Databricks or Julia?
On our 0-100 score Databricks rates higher (82/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Databricks and Julia compare on the numbers?
Databricks leads on our overall score (82/100 against 61/100), domain rating (88/100 against 79/100), funding raised ($37B against $15.0M).
What do real users say about Databricks and Julia?
Julia: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full Databricks review and pricing or the Julia review and pricing. You can also browse other Databricks alternatives we track.