DANA vs FIS
DANA vs FIS, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: DANA is on 70/100 and FIS on 69/100.
Where each one leads
DANA
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
FIS
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 24/100
- funding raised: $11B against $200M
At a glance
| Measure | DANA | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An all-in-one digital wallet to simplify daily transactions. | Global leader in financial technology providing solutions for payments, banking, and capital markets. |
| Category | Fintech, Digital Payments, Mobile Payments, E-commerce | Fintech, Payments, Banking Technology, Capital Markets |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software | services | platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 1968 |
| Headquarters | Jakarta, Indonesia | Jacksonville, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | DANA | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,341 | Not published |
| Total funding | $200M | $11B |
| Latest round | Series B | Series 16 |
| Valuation | Not published | $33B |
| LinkedIn followers | 248,754 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | DANA | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 40/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 97/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 89/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (24/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | DANA | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
DANA vs FIS: common questions
Which is better, DANA or FIS?
On our 0-100 score DANA rates higher (70/100 against 69/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do DANA and FIS compare on the numbers?
FIS leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 24/100), funding raised ($11B against $200M).
Read the full DANA review and pricing or the FIS review and pricing. You can also browse other DANA alternatives we track.