DANA vs Ebury
DANA vs Ebury, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: DANA is on 70/100 and Ebury on 55/100.
Where each one leads
DANA
- our overall score: 70/100 against 55/100
- LinkedIn following: 248,754 against 97,606
Ebury
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 24/100
- funding raised: $630M against $200M
At a glance
| Measure | DANA | Ebury |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An all-in-one digital wallet to simplify daily transactions. | A global financial services company providing foreign exchange and international payment solutions for SMEs. |
| Category | Fintech, Digital Payments, Mobile Payments, E-commerce | Fintech, Financial Services, Payments, Foreign Exchange |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2018 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Jakarta, Indonesia | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | DANA | Ebury |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,341 | 1,965 |
| Total funding | $200M | $630M |
| Latest round | Series B | Debt Financing |
| LinkedIn followers | 248,754 | 97,606 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | DANA | Ebury |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 97/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (24/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | DANA | Ebury |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
DANA vs Ebury: common questions
Which is better, DANA or Ebury?
On our 0-100 score DANA rates higher (70/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do DANA and Ebury compare on the numbers?
DANA leads on our overall score (70/100 against 55/100), LinkedIn following (248,754 against 97,606). Ebury leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 24/100), funding raised ($630M against $200M).
Read the full DANA review and pricing or the Ebury review and pricing. You can also browse other DANA alternatives we track.