D-Wave vs IBM
D-Wave vs IBM, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: D-Wave is on 51/100 and IBM on 61/100.
Where each one leads
D-Wave
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 31/100
IBM
- our overall score: 61/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 75/100
At a glance
| Measure | D-Wave | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Pioneering quantum computing company offering annealing and gate-model systems, software, and cloud services. | Global technology leader providing AI, cloud, software, and consulting services for businesses. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, AI Chip | Software, Cloud Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 1999 | 1911 |
| Headquarters | Burnaby, Canada | Armonk, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | D-Wave | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 324,517 |
| Total funding | Not published | $153M |
| Latest round | Not published | Follow-on |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | D-Wave | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 21/100 | 49/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 92/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | D-Wave | IBM |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Microsoft Clarity +1 more | Microsoft Clarity |
| Open source | Yes | No |
D-Wave vs IBM: common questions
Which is better, D-Wave or IBM?
On our 0-100 score IBM rates higher (61/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do D-Wave and IBM compare on the numbers?
D-Wave leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 31/100). IBM leads on our overall score (61/100 against 51/100), domain rating (92/100 against 75/100).
Read the full D-Wave review and pricing or the IBM review and pricing. You can also browse other D-Wave alternatives we track.