Cyware vs Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings
Cyware vs Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Cyware is on 60/100 and Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Cyware
- our overall score: 60/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 48/100
Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings
- domain rating: 88/100 against 73/100
- headcount: 22,232 against 220
- LinkedIn following: 1,908,870 against 64,908
At a glance
| Measure | Cyware | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cybersecurity threat intelligence and security operations platform. | Cybersecurity solutions for network, cloud, and hybrid workforces, leveraging threat intelligence and consulting. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Security Operations, Incident Response | Cybersecurity, Network Security, Cloud Security, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Wilmington, United States | תל אביב - יפו, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Cyware | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 220 | 22,232 |
| Total funding | $21.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 64,908 | 1,908,870 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Cyware | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (57/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Cyware | Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Cyware vs Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings: common questions
Which is better, Cyware or Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings?
On our 0-100 score Cyware rates higher (60/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Cyware and Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings compare on the numbers?
Cyware leads on our overall score (60/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (57/100 against 48/100). Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings leads on domain rating (88/100 against 73/100), headcount (22,232 against 220), LinkedIn following (1,908,870 against 64,908).
Read the full Cyware review and pricing or the Palo Alto Networks Israel Holdings review and pricing. You can also browse other Cyware alternatives we track.