CyVers vs ENS (Ethereum Name Service)
CyVers vs ENS (Ethereum Name Service), compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CyVers is on 55/100 and ENS (Ethereum Name Service) on 53/100.
Where each one leads
CyVers
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 26/100
- funding raised: $9.0M against $1.0M
ENS (Ethereum Name Service)
- domain rating: 79/100 against 38/100
At a glance
| Measure | CyVers | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Web3 attack remediation platform using geometric machine learning for real-time cryptocurrency attack detection. | Decentralized naming system for the Ethereum blockchain, mapping human-readable names to Ethereum addresses and Web3 resources. |
| Category | Web3, Blockchain, DeFi, Cybersecurity | Web3, Blockchain, DeFi, Identity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CyVers | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 37 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +13.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $9.0M | $1.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Grant |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,336 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CyVers | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 30/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | F (26/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 79/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CyVers | ENS (Ethereum Name Service) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Render | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Base44 | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Plausible |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Not detected | Crypto Payments |
| Open source | No | Yes |
CyVers vs ENS (Ethereum Name Service): common questions
Which is better, CyVers or ENS (Ethereum Name Service)?
On our 0-100 score CyVers rates higher (55/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CyVers and ENS (Ethereum Name Service) compare on the numbers?
CyVers leads on agent readiness (66/100 against 26/100), funding raised ($9.0M against $1.0M). ENS (Ethereum Name Service) leads on domain rating (79/100 against 38/100).
Read the full CyVers review and pricing or the ENS (Ethereum Name Service) review and pricing. You can also browse other CyVers alternatives we track.